|
Home Auxiliary Legislation Officers Staffing Fire Safety Local News National News Exchange Calendar 4th District PFFA Human Relations Union Meetings Calendar of Events Bulletin Board Civil Service M.D.A. Awards Not Forgotten Membership Burn Fund Did you know LSU@Eunice www.IAFF.org www.pffala.com Stations Kids Korner Merchandise
| |
Hot Topics
   
|
State Pay Increase
To
all Local Presidents and Members,
During the last legislative session the PFFA of LA presented
legislation for a pay increase to legislators and received great
support from both chambers and the Gov.’s office. The increase that
was being asked was $125.00, which was the same amount that the
teachers were asking with the Governors support. We were asked to be
patient until there was a better look at what the budget would look
like. As you read the news articles the Governor is in support of
the pay increase. Governor Blanco does not want this increase to be
political and feels that this is the right time and that it is the
right thing to do. This is a well deserved increase and it will help
those fire fighters that are struggling to make ends meet. It may
also help retain fire fighters and assist in recruiting new hires.
Terry Castille
Better pay is needed
to attract and retain firefighters especially after hurricanes
Katrina and Rita, said Chad Major, president of the Professional
Fire Fighters of Louisiana Association.
“It is imperative
for everyone to understand that, to have commerce, to have people
come back and build homes, you have to have basic services to
provide public safety to those citizens as well as those
businesses,” Major said.
Law enforcement leaders launched a new
bid Monday for a pay increase when legislators meet Dec. 8 to start
dividing up to $1.6 billion of state surplus funds.
Exactly how big a raise they will seek
is unclear. “We are still working on that,” said Sid Hebert,
president of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association.
The increase would be in the form of
additional supplemental pay, which the state has added to the local
pay of police officers, firefighters and deputy sheriffs since
1956.
Offices receive $300 per month.
Earlier this year, lawmakers considered an increase of up to $125,
to $425 per month. That push died amid questions about the state
budget outlook, which has gotten brighter since then.
Gov. Kathleen Blanco has called a
10-day special session starting Dec. 8 to decide what to do with a
$827 million surplus from the financial year that ended June 30.
Lawmakers also will start mapping
plans for how to spend another $800 million in surplus dollars that
Blanco said she expects from this financial year, which ends June
30, 2007.
“We know that the state has the
money,” said Peter Dale, second vice president of the Louisiana
Chiefs of Police Association.
The state has about 32,000 first
responders, including police, fire and deputy personnel. Blanco said
last week she favors a pay raise for police and fire officials but
declined to say how much.
Law enforcement officials said Monday
they are confident lawmakers will support an increase because the
push for one earlier this year attracted a huge following. Hal
Turner, director of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, said it
cost the state about $21 million for each $100 of additional
supplemental pay.
The $125 hike considered earlier this
would have cost $27.4 million. |

|
IAFF Wins Passage of HELPS Retirees
Bill
August 4, 2006 – The IAFF has won an
unprecedented congressional victory in the successful passage of its
HELPs retiree health care proposal and the elimination of early
withdraw penalties from Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP)
accounts. Both proposals have been top IAFF legislative priorities
this year.
“The joint passage of HELPs and the
DROP language represent the most significant financial benefits ever
provided by Congress exclusively to the nation’s fire fighters and
other public safety employees,” says IAFF General President Harold
Schaitberger. “It is an enormous achievement.”
The bill, H.R 4, the Pension
Protection Act of 2006, was passed overwhelmingly late August 3 in
the U.S. Senate. The House had passed the identical bill last week.
The legislation now heads to The White House for the president’s
signature. All indications suggest that President George Bush will
sign the measure.
Beginning in 2007,
all current and future public safety retirees will receive a $3,000
tax credit towards the cost of health insurance or long-term
care insurance premiums. Depending on the retiree’s tax bracket,
this equals tax savings of between
$540 and $870 per year. “The average retiree will see a
lifetime in pocket tax savings in the tens of thousands of dollars,”
says President Schaitberger. “The passage of HELPs is a real and
measurable benefit to every IAFF member.”
The total cost of HELPs is in excess
of $3.4 billion over the next 10 years.
Also included in
H.R 4 is language eliminating the 10 percent penalty for withdrawals
from DROP accounts prior to age 59 1/2. Beginning January 1, 2007,
retirees can access DROP money at age 50.
“The passage of this bill is the
result of 18 months of hard work and effective lobbying of
leadership in both parties about the necessity of passing a pension
bill that included our HELPs and DROP language.”
The IAFF’s proposal was supported by
several congressional allies, including Representative Chris Chocola
(R-IN), the bill’s principal sponsor who shepherded the legislation
throughout the entire process.
“This victory is the result of our
bipartisan approach to politics and lobbying,” Schaitberger says.
“Once again, our union has delivered real results for our membership
and highlighted the value and importance of political action.”
|
Department of Justice
Issues New PSOB Regulations
August 10, 2006 – Nearly
three years after the Hometown Heroes Survivors Benefit
Act was passed into law, the Department of Justice (DoJ)
has issued the new rules under the Public Safety Officer
Benefits (PSOB) program. The new regulations which are a
complete rewrite, clarification and consolidation of all
prior regulations, including the heart and stroke
benefits, take effect September 11, 2006. The effective
coverage dates of the PSOB law and all subsequent
legislative amendments to the act, however are
unchanged. Thus certain heart attack and stroke line of
duty deaths are covered by the benefits beginning on
December 15, 2003.
“We are very pleased that
these regulations have finally been released,” says IAFF
General President Harold Schaitberger. “It is
unfortunate that the families of fallen fire fighters
have waited so long, but we needed to ensure that our
members’ families are fully protected and receive due
benefits in the event of a line-of-duty death.”
The DoJ’s first draft of
the regulations – released for comment in September 2005
– would have made it nearly impossible to collect
benefits from deaths caused by heart attack or stroke.
The IAFF provided extensive comments and, through
bipartisan political outreach, was successful in
educating the Department of Justice on several areas of
concern and in garnering the support of Senator Bill
Frist (R-TN), Representative Roy Blunt R-MO),
Representative Steny Hoyer (D-MD), Representative Curt
Weldon (R-PA) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to revise
the regulations.
“It was a long battle, but
has ended in another success and serves as one more
example of our ability to achieve results against long
odds,” says President Schaitberger. “The new regulations
ensure that the intent of Hometown Heroes is met and
that the families of fire fighters who perish as a
result of a heart attack or stroke receive PSOB
benefits.”
The
new regulations provide that if a public safety officer
dies as a result of a heart attack or stroke, the death
may be presumed to have been the result of a personal
injury sustained in the line of duty. The law requires
that the heart attack or stroke occurs while the officer
is on duty and engaged in an emergency response activity
or training exercise, or within 24 hours of such
activity or exercise.
Click here to download the new rules for the PSOB
program. |
|
|
Attention
all 4th District members:
I am pleased to announce to you that
the IAFF is forming a Union Sportsman’s Club.
The IAFF has joined several other
trade unions in affiliation with the Theodore Roosevelt
Conservation Partnership (TRCP) to give IAFF members a voice in
an organization that focuses on conserving, maintaining, and
enhancing access to land for hunting, shooting and fishing. TRCP
offers television programs on the Outdoor Life Network (OLN)
that features union members participating in these activities.
In the coming months, the unions
within the TRCP will roll out a union-focused sportsman’s club that
will have its own magazine, website, radio show and affinity
programs (such as discounts on UNION American-Canadian made
guns, hunting and fishing gear and adventure trips).
IAFF G.P. Harold Schaitberger
attended the first meeting of a working group of union presidents at
the worlds largest outdoor event, the shoot show, to develop the
parameters of, the union sportsman’s club.
In the meantime, IAFF members can
signup (IT’S FREE!!) to be a union sportsman club
member. Visit
www.trcp.org or call (877) 770-8722.
The IAFF is also participating in a
promotion that allows IAFF members to enter to win a hunting trip to
be featured on TRCP/OLN’s television show
“Wildest Dreams”. For
more information, visit,
www.olntv.com/wildestdreams.
Fraternally,
Terry Castille,
4th District Vice
President
(337) 412-6034 (H)
(337) 344-2384 ©
Castillefire619@cox.net |
|
HELPS
Retirees Act Approved in Key Committee
November 10, 2005 - The IAFF proposal to make
health care more affordable for retired public safety officers
took a major stride in November when the House Ways and Means
Committee approved the initiative as part of comprehensive
pension legislation.
While some provisions of the broad pension
bill (HR 2830) are controversial, the IAFF language was adopted
without dissent. The proposal would allow retired fire fighters
and law enforcement officers to designate funds from their
retirement plans to pay for health care costs without paying
federal taxes on the money. If adopted, the Healthcare
Enhancement for Local Public Safety (HELPS) Retirees Act would
reduce the cost of health insurance for thousands of emergency
responders who are faced with large insurance premiums when they
retire.
The HELPS Retirees Act was introduced as
free-standing bill (HR 2177) by Representatives Chris Chocola
(R-IN) and Richard Neal (D-MA) and has been cosponsored by
nearly 100 members of Congress. Working closely with
congressional allies and other organizations, the IAFF convinced
Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee Representative Bill
Thomas (R-CA) to include the language of HR 2177 as an amendment
to HR 2830. The bill was then voted out of the Committee, and
sent to the House floor for action.
The Committee action marks the first time
Congress has attempted to address the problem of access to
health care for people who retire before they are eligible for
Medicare. There have been a number of competing proposals in
recent years to expand access to health care, but most have
proven controversial. The HELPS Retirees Act is the first to
draw significant support from both Democrats and Republicans.
“The Ways and Means action is further proof
that our bipartisan approach to politics pays off,” says IAFF
General President Harold Schaitberger. “This significant stride
forward could not have happened without the strong relationships
the IAFF has developed on both sides of the aisle.”
Whether the full House of Representatives will
be able to take up the bill before adjourning for the year
remains unclear, and depends largely on whether agreements can
be reached on unrelated issues. Because Congress works on a
two-year cycle, the Ways and Means Committee action carries
through to 2006, so the bill will not go back to square one if
Congress is unable to act on it this year. |
|
|
|
|
Public Employee Partnership Act

SB98 - 2005
http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=294810
Be Prepared to talk to your Senators and
Representatives!

Top of Page

Top of Page

Top of Page
Mandatory Social Security Coverage
Background:
When
the social security system was created in 1935, government employees were
expressly excluded. Even when state and local governments were given the option
to join the system in the 1950s, many fire departments were still legally barred
from electing Social Security coverage until 1994. Because of this long
exclusion from the Social Security system, local governments created pension
systems for fire fighters that address their retirement needs without Social
Security.
An estimated 75% of all fire fighters are
covered by pension plans that are independent of Social Security. These
comprehensive plans are tailored to meet the unique needs of fire fighters by
taking into consideration the early retirement ages and high rates of disability
retirement that are characteristic of public safety occupations.
Proposals to bring all public sector
workers into the Social Security system have often surfaced as part of a broader
debate over restructuring the Social Security system. Advocates of mandatory
coverage site the increased revenue that would be reaped from the additional
participants in the system. They also argue that many government workers qualify
for Social Security benefits – either through their spouse or by participating
in the system at a second job – and that it is unfair to exempt such people from
paying Social Security taxes at their primary occupation.
Opponents of mandatory coverage reply that
existing pension systems do a much better job of providing for their workers’
retirement security than Social Security, and these specialized retirement plans
would likely be curtailed or abolished if employers and employees were forced to
pay into Social Security. Further, the Social Security benefits paid to workers
who qualify for Social Security from a second job or a spouse are significantly
reduced, so they are not receiving any benefit to which they are not fully
entitled. Finally, opponents note that the added revenue to the Social Security
Trust Fund would be minimal, and not worth the disruption in the retirement
security of millions of government workers.
LEGISLATION:
Although no legislation requiring mandatory coverage has been introduced in the
109th Congress thus far, the idea is included in some of the
proposals being advocated by organizations involved in the Social Security
debate.
IAFF POSITION:
The
IAFF opposes mandatory Social Security coverage of non-coverage public
sector employees.
CURRENT STATUS:
In
his state of the union address, President Bush identified reform of the Social
Security systems as a top priority for the 109th Congress.
Congressional leaders have not yet identified a precise timetable for
considering the various competing proposals.
Top of Page

Dear Brother and Sister
Firefighters,
Some 57 million
workers in America say they would join a union tomorrow if they could. On April
19, 2005, a bill was reintroduced in both houses of Congress that level the
playing field for workers trying to form unions. It’s the by-partisan Employee
Free Choice Act, and it could make a world of difference for working people
trying to gain a voice on the job.
The bill was introduced into the 109th Congress by Senators Edward
Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Arlen Specter (R- Pa.) and Representatives Pete King (R-
N.Y.) and George Miller (D- Calif.)
The Employee Free Choice Act would insure that when a majority of employees in a
work place decide to form a union, they can do so without the debilitating
obstacles now used to block their free choice.
Specifically, the Employee Free Choice Act would strengthen protections for
workers’ freedom to form unions by requiring employers to recognize a union once
a majority of workers sign cards authorizing union representation. It also would
provide for mediation and arbitration of first-contract disputes and authorize
stronger penalties for employers that violate the legal rights of workers
seeking to form a union or negotiate first contracts.
I
have retrieved a letter that will assist you when you write or e-mail your
Senators and respective Congressmen. You can go to the page “ Tips for writing
to congress” to help assist you in formally writing your letter.
Please send a
message to your U.S. Senators and Congressmen urging them to co-author the
Employee Free Choice Act.
Tell
me more!

Subject:
Co-Sponsor the Employee Free
Choice Act
Dear (Decision Maker),
I urge you
to support the Employee Free Choice Act.
I know how
important it is for workers to be able to freely form unions to
secure a decent standard of living, affordable heath insurance
and a safe workplace. For our democracy to work, workers must
have a voice in our workplace, communities and in our nation’s
civic and political life.
Among the
basic human rights guaranteed by the 1948 Universal Declaration
of human rights is the freedom to form and join trade unions,
recognized by the U.S. Government 13 years earlier in the
National Labor Relations Act.
But today
in America, when workers try to form unions they are routinely
fired, threatened and coerced. In fact workers who support a
union or fired in 25 percent of private-sector union election
campaigns. We must have strong laws to support the basic freedom
of workers to choose for themselves whether to have a union.
I urge you
to become a co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act. If you
are already a co-sponsor, I want to thank you for your support.
Sincerely,
(Your Name)
(Your Address)
|
Top of Page

|