Home
Auxiliary
Legislation
Officers
Staffing
Fire Safety
Local News
National News
Exchange Calendar
4th District PFFA
Human Relations
Union Meetings
Calendar of Events
Bulletin Board
Civil Service
M.D.A.
Awards
Not Forgotten
Membership
Burn Fund
Did you know
LSU@Eunice
www.IAFF.org
www.pffala.com
Stations
Kids Korner
Merchandise

Hot Topics

Collective BargainingSocial SecurityGain a UnionLegislative Session

 

State Pay Increase

To all Local Presidents and Members,

During the last legislative session the PFFA of LA presented legislation for a pay increase to legislators and received great support from both chambers and the Gov.’s office. The increase that was being asked was $125.00, which was the same amount that the teachers were asking with the Governors support. We were asked to be patient until there was a better look at what the budget would look like. As you read the news articles the Governor is in support of the pay increase. Governor Blanco does not want this increase to be political and feels that this is the right time and that it is the right thing to do. This is a well deserved increase and it will help those fire fighters that are struggling to make ends meet. It may also help retain fire fighters and assist in recruiting new hires.

Terry Castille

Better pay is needed to attract and retain firefighters especially after hurricanes Katrina and Rita, said Chad Major, president of the Professional Fire Fighters of Louisiana Association.

“It is imperative for everyone to understand that, to have commerce, to have people come back and build homes, you have to have basic services to provide public safety to those citizens as well as those businesses,” Major said.

Law enforcement leaders launched a new bid Monday for a pay increase when legislators meet Dec. 8 to start dividing up to $1.6 billion of state surplus funds.

Exactly how big a raise they will seek is unclear. “We are still working on that,” said Sid Hebert, president of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association.

The increase would be in the form of additional supplemental pay, which the state has added to the local pay of police officers, firefighters  and deputy sheriffs since 1956.

Offices receive $300 per month. Earlier this year, lawmakers considered an increase of up to $125, to $425 per month. That push died amid questions about the state budget outlook, which has gotten brighter since then.

Gov. Kathleen Blanco has called a 10-day special session starting Dec. 8 to decide what to do with a $827 million surplus from the financial year that ended June 30.

Lawmakers also will start mapping plans for how to spend another $800 million in surplus dollars that Blanco said she expects from this financial year, which ends June 30, 2007.

“We know that the state has the money,” said Peter Dale, second vice president of the Louisiana Chiefs of Police Association.

The state has about 32,000 first responders, including police, fire and deputy personnel. Blanco said last week she favors a pay raise for police and fire officials but declined to say how much.

Law enforcement officials said Monday they are confident lawmakers will support an increase because the push for one earlier this year attracted a huge following. Hal Turner, director of the Louisiana Sheriffs’ Association, said it cost the state about $21 million for each $100 of additional supplemental pay.

The $125 hike considered earlier this would have cost $27.4 million.

 

 

Across the IAFF

 

IAFF Wins Passage of HELPS Retirees Bill

August 4, 2006 – The IAFF has won an unprecedented congressional victory in the successful passage of its HELPs retiree health care proposal and the elimination of early withdraw penalties from Deferred Retirement Option Program (DROP) accounts. Both proposals have been top IAFF legislative priorities this year.

“The joint passage of HELPs and the DROP language represent the most significant financial benefits ever provided by Congress exclusively to the nation’s fire fighters and other public safety employees,” says IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger. “It is an enormous achievement.”

The bill, H.R 4, the Pension Protection Act of 2006, was passed overwhelmingly late August 3 in the U.S. Senate. The House had passed the identical bill last week. The legislation now heads to The White House for the president’s signature. All indications suggest that President George Bush will sign the measure.

Beginning in 2007, all current and future public safety retirees will receive a $3,000 tax credit towards the cost of health insurance or long-term care insurance premiums. Depending on the retiree’s tax bracket, this equals tax savings of between $540 and $870 per year. “The average retiree will see a lifetime in pocket tax savings in the tens of thousands of dollars,” says President Schaitberger. “The passage of HELPs is a real and measurable benefit to every IAFF member.”

The total cost of HELPs is in excess of $3.4 billion over the next 10 years.

Also included in H.R 4 is language eliminating the 10 percent penalty for withdrawals from DROP accounts prior to age 59 1/2. Beginning January 1, 2007, retirees can access DROP money at age 50.

“The passage of this bill is the result of 18 months of hard work and effective lobbying of leadership in both parties about the necessity of passing a pension bill that included our HELPs and DROP language.”

The IAFF’s proposal was supported by several congressional allies, including Representative Chris Chocola (R-IN), the bill’s principal sponsor who shepherded the legislation throughout the entire process.

“This victory is the result of our bipartisan approach to politics and lobbying,” Schaitberger says. “Once again, our union has delivered real results for our membership and highlighted the value and importance of political action.”

Department of Justice Issues New PSOB Regulations 

August 10, 2006 – Nearly three years after the Hometown Heroes Survivors Benefit Act was passed into law, the Department of Justice (DoJ) has issued the new rules under the Public Safety Officer Benefits (PSOB) program. The new regulations which are a complete rewrite, clarification and consolidation of all prior regulations, including the heart and stroke benefits, take effect September 11, 2006.  The effective coverage dates of the PSOB law and all subsequent legislative amendments to the act, however are unchanged.  Thus certain heart attack and stroke line of duty deaths are covered by the benefits beginning on December 15, 2003.

“We are very pleased that these regulations have finally been released,” says IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger. “It is unfortunate that the families of fallen fire fighters have waited so long, but we needed to ensure that our members’ families are fully protected and receive due benefits in the event of a line-of-duty death.”

The DoJ’s first draft of the regulations – released for comment in September 2005 – would have made it nearly impossible to collect benefits from deaths caused by heart attack or stroke. The IAFF provided extensive comments and, through bipartisan political outreach, was successful in educating the Department of Justice on several areas of concern and in garnering the support of Senator Bill Frist (R-TN), Representative Roy Blunt R-MO), Representative Steny Hoyer (D-MD), Representative Curt Weldon (R-PA) and Senator Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to revise the regulations.

“It was a long battle, but has ended in another success and serves as one more example of our ability to achieve results against long odds,” says President Schaitberger. “The new regulations ensure that the intent of Hometown Heroes is met and that the families of fire fighters who perish as a result of a heart attack or stroke receive PSOB benefits.”

The new regulations provide that if a public safety officer dies as a result of a heart attack or stroke, the death may be presumed to have been the result of a personal injury sustained in the line of duty. The law requires that the heart attack or stroke occurs while the officer is on duty and engaged in an emergency response activity or training exercise, or within 24 hours of such activity or exercise.

Click here to download the new rules for the PSOB program.

 

 

Attention all 4th District members: 

I am pleased to announce to you that the IAFF is forming a Union Sportsman’s Club. 

 

The IAFF has joined several other trade unions in affiliation with the Theodore Roosevelt Conservation Partnership (TRCP) to give IAFF members a voice in an organization that focuses on conserving, maintaining, and enhancing access to land for hunting, shooting and fishing. TRCP offers television programs on the Outdoor Life Network (OLN) that features union members participating in these activities. 

In the coming months, the unions within the TRCP will roll out a union-focused sportsman’s club that will have its own magazine, website, radio show and affinity programs (such as discounts on UNION American-Canadian made guns, hunting and fishing gear and adventure trips). 

IAFF G.P. Harold Schaitberger attended the first meeting of a working group of union presidents at the worlds largest outdoor event, the shoot show, to develop the parameters of,  the union sportsman’s club. 

In the meantime, IAFF members can signup (IT’S FREE!!) to be a union sportsman club member. Visit www.trcp.org or call (877) 770-8722. 

The IAFF is also participating in a promotion that allows IAFF members to enter to win a hunting trip to be featured on TRCP/OLN’s television show

Wildest Dreams”. For more information, visit, www.olntv.com/wildestdreams.

 Fraternally, 

Terry Castille,

4th District Vice President

(337) 412-6034 (H)

(337) 344-2384 ©

Castillefire619@cox.net

HELPS Retirees Act Approved in Key Committee

November 10, 2005 - The IAFF proposal to make health care more affordable for retired public safety officers took a major stride in November when the House Ways and Means Committee approved the initiative as part of comprehensive pension legislation.

While some provisions of the broad pension bill (HR 2830) are controversial, the IAFF language was adopted without dissent. The proposal would allow retired fire fighters and law enforcement officers to designate funds from their retirement plans to pay for health care costs without paying federal taxes on the money. If adopted, the Healthcare Enhancement for Local Public Safety (HELPS) Retirees Act would reduce the cost of health insurance for thousands of emergency responders who are faced with large insurance premiums when they retire.

The HELPS Retirees Act was introduced as free-standing bill (HR 2177) by Representatives Chris Chocola (R-IN) and Richard Neal (D-MA) and has been cosponsored by nearly 100 members of Congress. Working closely with congressional allies and other organizations, the IAFF convinced Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee Representative Bill Thomas (R-CA) to include the language of HR 2177 as an amendment to HR 2830. The bill was then voted out of the Committee, and sent to the House floor for action.

The Committee action marks the first time Congress has attempted to address the problem of access to health care for people who retire before they are eligible for Medicare. There have been a number of competing proposals in recent years to expand access to health care, but most have proven controversial. The HELPS Retirees Act is the first to draw significant support from both Democrats and Republicans.

“The Ways and Means action is further proof that our bipartisan approach to politics pays off,” says IAFF General President Harold Schaitberger. “This significant stride forward could not have happened without the strong relationships the IAFF has developed on both sides of the aisle.”

Whether the full House of Representatives will be able to take up the bill before adjourning for the year remains unclear, and depends largely on whether agreements can be reached on unrelated issues. Because Congress works on a two-year cycle, the Ways and Means Committee action carries through to 2006, so the bill will not go back to square one if Congress is unable to act on it this year.  

International Association of Fire Fighters
1750 New York Ave., NW, Washington, DC 20006 • 202.737.8484 • 202.737.8418 (Fax)

 

Public Employee Partnership Act

IAFF Analysis What's Required Talking Points

SB98 - 2005  http://www.legis.state.la.us/billdata/streamdocument.asp?did=294810

 

Be Prepared to talk to your Senators and Representatives!

 

Top of Page

Top of Page

Top of Page

Mandatory Social Security Coverage

Background: 

When the social security system was created in 1935, government employees were expressly excluded. Even when state and local governments were given the option to join the system in the 1950s, many fire departments were still legally barred from electing Social Security coverage until 1994. Because of this long exclusion from the Social Security system, local governments created pension systems for fire fighters that address their retirement needs without Social Security.

 An estimated 75% of all fire fighters are covered by pension plans that are independent of Social Security. These comprehensive plans are tailored to meet the unique needs of fire fighters by taking into consideration the early retirement ages and high rates of disability retirement that are characteristic of public safety occupations.

 Proposals to bring all public sector workers into the Social Security system have often surfaced as part of a broader debate over restructuring the Social Security system. Advocates of mandatory coverage site the increased revenue that would be reaped from the additional participants in the system. They also argue that many government workers qualify for Social Security benefits – either through their spouse or by participating in the system at a second job – and that it is unfair to exempt such people from paying Social Security taxes at their primary occupation.

 Opponents of mandatory coverage reply that existing pension systems do a much better job of providing for their workers’ retirement security than Social Security, and these specialized retirement plans would likely be curtailed or abolished if employers and employees were forced to pay into Social Security. Further, the Social Security benefits paid to workers who qualify for Social Security from a second job or a spouse are significantly reduced, so they are not receiving any benefit to which they are not fully entitled. Finally, opponents note that the added revenue to the Social Security Trust Fund would be minimal, and not worth the disruption in the retirement security of millions of government workers.

LEGISLATION:

Although no legislation requiring mandatory coverage has been introduced in the 109th Congress thus far, the idea is included in some of the proposals being advocated by organizations involved in the Social Security debate.

 

IAFF POSITION: 

The IAFF opposes mandatory Social Security coverage of non-coverage public sector employees.

 

CURRENT STATUS

In his state of the union address, President Bush identified reform of the Social Security systems as a top priority for the 109th Congress. Congressional leaders have not yet identified a precise timetable for considering the various competing proposals.

 

Top of Page

Dear Brother and Sister Firefighters, 

            Some 57 million workers in America say they would join a union tomorrow if they could. On April 19, 2005, a bill was reintroduced in both houses of Congress that level the playing field for workers trying to form unions. It’s the by-partisan Employee Free Choice Act, and it could make a world of difference for working people trying to gain a voice on the job.

The bill was introduced into the 109th Congress by Senators Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Arlen Specter (R- Pa.) and Representatives Pete King (R- N.Y.) and George Miller (D- Calif.)  

The Employee Free Choice Act would insure that when a majority of employees in a work place decide to form a union, they can do so without the debilitating obstacles now used to block their free choice.

Specifically, the Employee Free Choice Act would strengthen protections for workers’ freedom to form unions by requiring employers to recognize a union once a majority of workers sign cards authorizing union representation. It also would provide for mediation and arbitration of first-contract disputes and authorize stronger penalties for employers that violate the legal rights of workers seeking to form a union or negotiate first contracts.

I have retrieved a letter that will assist you when you write or e-mail your Senators and respective Congressmen. You can go to the page “ Tips for writing to congress” to help assist you in formally writing your letter.

            Please send a message to your U.S. Senators and Congressmen urging them to co-author the Employee Free Choice Act.

 Tell me more!

 

 

Subject:

Co-Sponsor the Employee Free Choice Act 

Dear (Decision Maker), 

I urge you to support the Employee Free Choice Act. 

I know how important it is for workers to be able to freely form unions to secure a decent standard of living, affordable heath insurance and a safe workplace. For our democracy to work, workers must have a voice in our workplace, communities and in our nation’s civic and political life. 

Among the basic human rights guaranteed by the 1948 Universal Declaration of human rights is the freedom to form and join trade unions, recognized by the U.S. Government 13 years earlier in the National Labor Relations Act. 

But today in America, when workers try to form unions they are routinely fired, threatened and coerced. In fact workers who support a union or fired in 25 percent of private-sector union election campaigns. We must have strong laws to support the basic freedom of workers to choose for themselves whether to have a union. 

I urge you to become a co-sponsor of the Employee Free Choice Act. If you are already a co-sponsor, I want to thank you for your support. 

Sincerely,

(Your Name)

(Your Address)

 

 Top of Page

Email - UNION619@COX.NET

Contributions & Correspondence: Local #619  P.O. Box  446  Carencro, LA  70520

Hit Counter